Derrick Reshord Walton v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                   In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-19-00320-CR
    No. 02-19-00321-CR
    No. 02-19-00322-CR
    ___________________________
    DERRICK RESHORD WALTON, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    On Appeal from the 431st District Court
    Denton County, Texas
    Trial Court Nos. F17-2958-431, F17-2959-431, F17-2960-431
    Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Wallach, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On August 26, 2019, Derrick Reshord Walton filed a notice of appeal from the
    trial court’s orders finding his bonds insufficient in three pending cases. This is not
    the first time that Walton has attempted to appeal these very issues regarding these
    same cases. See Walton v. State, Nos. 02-18-00396-CR, 02-18-00397-CR, 02-18-00398-
    CR, 
    2018 WL 6424242
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 6, 2018, no pet.)
    (dismissing Walton’s notice of appeal aimed at challenging the trial court’s verbal
    denial of his attempts to reduce bail in the same three cases he now appeals and
    dismissing the appeals for want of jurisdiction).
    On September 4, 2019, we sent Walton a letter explaining our concern that we
    lack jurisdiction over these appeals because the trial court has not entered any
    appealable orders. See McKown v. State, 
    915 S.W.2d 160
    , 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
    1996, no pet.); see also Ragston v. State, 
    424 S.W.3d 49
    , 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)
    (holding that courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals of
    pretrial orders regarding excessive bail or denial of bail). Between October 7 and 15,
    2019, Walton responded three times to this court’s letter. Rather than showing that
    the trial court had entered any appealable orders, Walton argued that his bail is
    oppressive, that his court-appointed attorney is ineffective, and that he is being
    illegally detained. He has also requested preparation of both the clerk’s and reporter’s
    records. Because Walton has not demonstrated that we have jurisdiction over these
    appeals, we dismiss them for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    2
    /s/ Dana Womack
    Dana Womack
    Justice
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    Delivered: October 31, 2019
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-19-00322-CR

Filed Date: 10/31/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2019