Benedict Emesowum v. Christmas Eve Morgan ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 23, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-15-00513-CV
    BENEDICT EMESOWUM, Appellant
    V.
    CHRISTMAS EVE MORGAN, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1061501
    MEMORANDUM                      OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from an order sustaining a contest to appellant’s
    affidavit of indigence. The clerk’s record was filed June 19, 2015. The record
    reflects that no final judgment has been entered in this case. Generally, appeals
    may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001).
    On July 3, 2015, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s
    intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a
    response on or before July 14, 2015, demonstrating grounds for continuing the
    appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On July 10, 2015, appellant filed an
    “Amended Notice of Appeal and Statement on Jurisdiction,” in which he stated
    that he “prematurely filed a timely appeal of his denial of indigency by the trial
    court.” Appellant stated that the trial court issued a “final order” sustaining the
    contest to his affidavit on July 7, 2015. Appellant states that he is appealing the
    trial court’s order sustaining a contest to his affidavit of indigence.
    Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over
    the appeal. There is no statutory grant of the right to immediately appeal, before
    entry of final judgment, the matter about which appellant complains. See, e.g., Tex.
    Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014; Kilsby v. Mid Century Ins. Co. of Texas,
    14-07-00981-CV, 
    2008 WL 889428
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr.
    3, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal of order sustaining a contest to
    pauper’s oath when no final judgment had been entered).
    Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00513-CV

Filed Date: 7/23/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/23/2015