Norma Jean Sanchez v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 16, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-14-00780-CR
    NORMA JEAN SANCHEZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 351st District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1399973
    MEMORANDUM                 OPINION
    Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly
    weapon without an agreed recommendation on punishment. Appellant entered a
    plea of “true” to an enhancement paragraph and on September 18, 2014, the trial
    court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty years in the Institutional
    Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely
    notice of appeal.
    Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal
    is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), presenting a professional
    evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to
    be advanced. See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
    A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
    of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
    v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the
    record was provided to her. As of this date, no response has been filed.
    We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the
    appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
    the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the
    state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a
    pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
    review. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-14-00780-CR

Filed Date: 7/16/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/17/2015