in the Matter of the Estate of Thelma Pauline Taylor Erwin ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-14-00244-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE                               §    APPEAL FROM THE
    OF THELMA PAULINE TAYLOR                                  §    COUNTY COURT OF
    ERWIN, DECEASED                                           §    HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
    Appellant’s brief was due on June 22, 2015. However, Appellant did not file a brief on
    that date. On June 23, 2015, this court notified Appellant that her brief was past due. Appellant
    was warned that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless, on or before July 3,
    2015, she filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1),
    42.3(c). Appellant also was informed that the motion must include a reasonable explanation for
    her failure to timely file her brief and show that Appellee has not suffered significant injury
    thereby. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).
    To date, Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly,
    we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
    Opinion delivered July 8, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    JULY 8, 2015
    NO. 12-14-00244-CV
    IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
    THELMA PAULINE TAYLOR ERWIN, DECEASED
    Appeal from the County Court
    of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 28-2014)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the
    appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision
    be certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-14-00244-CV

Filed Date: 7/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/10/2015