in the Interest of S.L.J., S.D.J. and S.F.J., Children ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-15-00217-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF S.L.J., S.D.J. AND S.F.J., CHILDREN
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3
    Lubbock County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2012-501,593, Honorable Judy Parker, Presiding
    July 10, 2015
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
    J.K.J., appellant, attempts to appeal an order modifying possession of his three
    children. The order was signed on April 27, 2015. His notice of appeal was filed with
    the district clerk on June 1, 2015. We dismiss for failing to comply with a notice and
    court order requiring a response within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on May 27, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1.
    Though appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 1, 2015, no motion requesting an
    extension of the deadline accompanied it. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
    26.3, the Court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the
    deadline expires, the appellant files the notice of appeal along with a motion requesting
    an extension that reasonably explains the need for an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    26.3 & 10.5(b). Although a motion for extension is implied when an appellant tenders a
    notice of appeal within 15 days after the notice deadline, it is still necessary for
    appellant to reasonably explain the need for an extension. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617, (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston, 
    976 S.W.2d 676
    , 677 (Tex.
    1998).
    Because appellant filed a notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline, a
    motion for extension was implied. Yet, we ordered him to explain, in writing and by
    June 26, 2015, why the notice of appeal was filed late. We also informed appellant that
    the failure to comply with the directive would result in dismissal of the appeal. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 42.3. That deadline also lapsed without appellant responding to our directive
    for an explanation.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
    42.3(c) because appellant failed to comply with a notice and court order requiring a
    response within a specified time. Of course, appellant has 15 days to file a motion for
    rehearing wherein he may comply with our earlier directive.
    Per Curiam
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-15-00217-CV

Filed Date: 7/13/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/13/2015