Courtney Me-Sha Franklin v. State ( 2014 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00105-CR
COURTNEY ME-SHA FRANKLIN,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 12th District Court
Walker County, Texas
Trial Court No. 25,574
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Courtney Me-Sha Franklin was adjudicated guilty of the state-jail
felony offense of credit card or debit card abuse by the trial court after it found “true”
numerous violations of the conditions of her deferred adjudication community
supervision. The trial court assessed a two-year sentence, and Appellant appealed.
Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an
Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in
his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Although informed of her right to do so, Appellant did not file a
pro se response to the Anders brief.
In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, []
decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is “wholly frivolous” or
“without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486
U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988).
We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find
this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. We grant appointed
counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Appellant. Notwithstanding this
grant, appointed counsel must send Appellant a copy of our decision, notify her of her
right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter
certifying counsel’s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R.
APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
(Chief Justice Gray concurs with a note)*
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed December 18, 2014
Do not publish
[CR25]
Franklin v. State Page 2
*(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment to the extent it affirms the trial
court’s judgment. A separate opinion will not issue.)
Franklin v. State Page 3