Rosalind Isaac v. Midfirst Bank ( 2014 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00190-CV
Rosalind Isaac, Appellant
v.
Midfirst Bank, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 14-0056-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Rosalind Isaac filed a pro se brief on October 14, 2014. On November 5,
2014, we ordered Isaac to file an amended brief complying with the formal and substantive rules of
appellate procedure on or before December 4, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Bolling v. Farmers
Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 S.W.3d 893, 896 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (“To comply with
rule 38.1(f) [of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure], an appellant must articulate the issue we
will be asked to decide.”). In our order , we cautioned Isaac that her failure to comply could result
in the striking of her brief and the dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. To date, Isaac
has not complied with or otherwise responded to this Court’s order. Accordingly, we strike Isaac’s
brief and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Bolling, 315 S.W.3d at 897 (dismissing
pro se appeal for failure to comply with briefing requirements after opportunity to cure deficiencies).
__________________________________________
Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
Dismissed
Filed: December 18, 2014
2