in Re: Jamie Lee Bledsoe ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
    No. 06-14-00215-CR
    IN RE: JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE
    Original Mandamus Proceeding
    Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Jamie Lee Bledsoe has petitioned this Court for mandamus relief. Bledsoe claims to have
    been subjected to an illegal sentence following his criminal conviction, and to have received
    ineffective assistance of counsel. We deny relief.
    Bledsoe claims to have been convicted of burglary of a building. He claims that during
    the punishment phase of his trial, the State used improper prior convictions to enhance the range
    of punishment. He also claims his appellate attorney has rendered ineffective assistance of
    counsel.
    To be entitled to mandamus relief in a criminal case, a relator must show that he has no
    adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm and that what he seeks to compel is a
    ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth
    Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 
    236 S.W.3d 207
    , 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)
    (orig. proceeding).
    A challenge to the legality of a criminal sentence may be addressed on direct appeal. See
    Mizell v. State, 
    119 S.W.3d 804
    , 806 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The direct appeal of Bledsoe’s
    conviction is pending before this Court. See Bledsoe v. State, cause number 06-14-00138-CR.
    In fact, Bledsoe’s brief is not yet due, and, therefore, the direct appeal is not ripe for submission.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. As Bledsoe has an adequate remedy by appeal should any error in the
    sentencing be found, mandamus is not appropriate.
    2
    As for his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, Bledsoe’s appeal is still
    pending before this Court. Although habeas corpus is usually a preferable avenue for raising
    claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, such claims may be raised on direct appeal; therefore
    mandamus is not appropriate.
    We deny Bledsoe’s petition.
    Bailey C. Moseley
    Justice
    Date Submitted:       December 17, 2014
    Date Decided:         December 18, 2014
    Do Not Publish
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-14-00215-CR

Filed Date: 12/18/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/18/2014