Rudolf Hilburn, Jr. v. State ( 2014 )

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00383-CR
RUDOLF HILBURN, JR. APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 1352567D
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
----------
Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from a plea-bargained conviction
for felony driving while intoxicated. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial
court’s certification of the right of appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case,
and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
We notified appellant that unless he filed a response showing grounds for
continuing the appeal, we would dismiss it. Although appellant filed a response,
it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d
675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 29, 2014
2