in Re: Esther Drusina Hinson ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • Criminal Case Template

    COURT OF APPEALS

    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    EL PASO, TEXAS


    )

    ) No. 08-04-00119-CR

    IN RE: ESTHER DRUSINA HINSON,              )

    )AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                                                    Relator.                ) 

    ) FOR HABEAS CORPUS

    )

    )


    OPINION


                Esther Drusina Hinson has filed an application for writ of habeas corpus, claiming that she is illegally confined in the El Paso County Jail. The application does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects, including the failure to provide a record that demonstrates her entitlement to relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.7(a). It also appears from the application that Hinson is represented by counsel in the trial court. There is no right to hybrid representation in Texas. See Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1981). Accordingly, the application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.


    July 1, 2004                                                                

                                                                                        ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice


    Before Panel No. 4

    Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.


    (Do Not Publish)








    COURT OF APPEALS

    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    EL PASO, TEXAS


    )

    ) No. 08-04-00119-CR

    IN RE: ESTHER DRUSINA HINSON,              )

    )AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                                                    Relator.                ) 

    ) FOR HABEAS CORPUS

    )

    )


    J U D G M E N T


                The court has considered this cause on Relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus and concludes that Relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus should be denied. We therefore deny the application for writ of habeas corpus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

                IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2004.



                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                            Justice, Court of Appeals for the

                                                                            Eighth District of Texas



    Before Panel No. 4

    Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and McClure, JJ.








    COURT OF APPEALS

    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    EL PASO, TEXAS


    )

    ) No. 08-04-00119-CR

    IN RE: ESTHER DRUSINA HINSON,              )

    )AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                                                    Relator.                ) 

    ) FOR HABEAS CORPUS

    )

    )



    RECORD RETENTION STATEMENT:


                Pursuant to the Supreme Court order regarding disposition of court documents in this case, it is determined that this record should be:


                             NOT PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

                            (NO HISTORICAL VALUE)


                             PERMANENTLY PRESERVED

                            (PERMANENTLY RETAIN--HAS HISTORICAL VALUE)





                                                                                                    7/1/04

    Judge’s Signature                                                       Date


    Date Destroyed:          

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-04-00119-CR

Filed Date: 7/1/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/9/2015