Steven Scown and Wife Susan Scown v. Arthur "Van"Neie, Jr. and Wife Sue Lynn Neie ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • Becker v. State

    COURT OF APPEALS

    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    EL PASO, TEXAS


    )

    STEVEN and SUSAN SCOWN,                        )                  No. 08-05-00090-CV

    )

                                        Appellants,                       )                             Appeal from

    )

    v.                                                                          )                  394th District Court

    )

    ARTHUR “VAN” NEIE, JR. and                        )                  of Brewster County, Texas

    SUE LYNN NEIE,                                              )

                                                                                 ) (TC# 2004-02-B8086-CV)

                                        Appellees.                        )


    MEMORANDUM OPINION


                This appeal is before the court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellants have failed to file a brief or respond to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal.

    FACTS

                On October 26, 2005, this Court informed Appellants by letter that their brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The Court advised Appellants that their appeal would be dismissed unless they responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be continued. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8. No reply has been filed.

                This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ). We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none. We see no purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b), 42.3(c), and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.



    December 8, 2005                                                      

                                                                                        ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice


    Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-05-00090-CV

Filed Date: 12/8/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/9/2015