in Re Esequiel De La Paz ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                  NUMBER 13-19-00130-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    IN RE ESEQUIEL DE LA PAZ
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Contreras1
    Relator Esequiel De La Paz filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
    seeking to compel the trial court to dismiss the underlying election contest as moot and
    to cancel the general election for Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4 of Kleberg County,
    Texas, which is currently set to occur on May 4, 2019. By motion for emergency relief,
    relator seeks to abate the underlying trial court proceedings and the pending May 4, 2019
    general election.
    1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
    required to do so.”); see also 
    id. R. 47.4
    (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
    To obtain relief by writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that an underlying
    order is void or a clear abuse of discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.
    In re Nationwide Ins. Co. of Am., 
    494 S.W.3d 708
    , 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); In
    re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding);
    Walker v. Packer, 
    827 S.W.2d 833
    , 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). An abuse of
    discretion occurs when a trial court’s ruling is arbitrary and unreasonable or is made
    without regard for guiding legal principles or supporting evidence. In re 
    Nationwide, 494 S.W.3d at 712
    ; Ford Motor Co. v. Garcia, 
    363 S.W.3d 573
    , 578 (Tex. 2012).
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
    the record, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to
    obtain mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the motion for emergency relief and the
    petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), 52.10(b).
    DORI CONTRERAS
    Chief Justice
    Delivered and filed the
    1st day of April, 2019.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-19-00130-CV

Filed Date: 4/1/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/4/2019