Jose Trinidad Perez v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                NUMBER 13-18-00100-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    JOSE TRINIDAD PEREZ,                                                          Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                            Appellee.
    On appeal from the 389th District Court
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa
    Order Per Curiam
    Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 15, 2018. This Court previously
    granted appellant five extensions to file the brief. Counsel for appellant filed an Anders 1
    brief on March 14, 2019. The Clerk of this Court notified counsel by letter dated March
    1   Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744 (1967).
    14, 2019, that appellant’s brief was deficient and that counsel had failed to provide
    adequate documentation demonstrating compliance with Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).     The Clerk directed counsel to file an amended brief and
    appropriate documentation within ten days.       To date, counsel has failed to file an
    amended Anders brief and failed to demonstrate compliance with Kelly.
    Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court
    for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize
    whatever means necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations
    concerning the following: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why
    appellant’s counsel has failed to file a brief and whether counsel has effectively
    abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant has been denied effective assistance of
    counsel; (4) whether appellant’s counsel should be removed; and (5) whether appellant
    is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.
    If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that
    present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to
    court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant
    in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email
    address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing
    counsel.
    The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
    orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental
    2
    clerk’s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record
    of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental
    reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
    expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
    It is so ORDERED.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed the
    1st day of April, 2019.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-18-00100-CR

Filed Date: 4/1/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/4/2019