Zachery Alolabi ZL Investments, Inc. Napoli7 Flying Pizza, Inc. and Napoli 6 Pizzeria and Italian Resturant, Inc. v. Jason D. Kraus and Bouman Kraus, P.C. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2019.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-19-00107-CV
    ZACHERY ALOLABI; ZL INVESTMENTS, INC.; NAPOLI #7 FLYING
    PIZZA, INC.; AND NAPOLI #6 PIZZERIA AND ITALIAN RESTURANT,
    INC., Appellants
    V.
    JASON D. KRAUS AND BOUMAN KRAUS, P.C., Appellees
    On Appeal from the 190th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2017-57107
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from a final judgment signed October 9, 2018.
    Plaintiffs/appellants timely filed a motion for new trial on November 8, 2018.
    The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the judgment is signed
    when a timely post-judgment motion is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). The
    ninetieth day after the judgment was signed was January 7, 2019. Appellants did not
    file their notice of appeal until February 5, 2019.
    A motion to extend time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in
    good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within
    the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
    See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617–18 (1997) (construing the predecessor
    to Rule 26). Appellants’ notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period
    provided by Rule 26.3.
    A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal that was not timely
    perfected. When the court lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the appeal. See Baker
    v. Baker, 
    469 S.W.3d 269
    , 272 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.).
    On March 4, 2019, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s
    intention to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless, within 10 days, any
    party showed meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
    42.3(a). No response was filed.
    The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-19-00107-CV

Filed Date: 4/2/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/2/2019