Marcus Robinson v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued April 2, 2019
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-18-01076-CR
    ———————————
    MARCUS ROBINSON, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case No. 1578086
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Marcus Robinson, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of
    aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.1 The trial court found appellant guilty,
    1
    See TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.02.
    and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the
    State, sentenced appellant to twelve years in prison. Appellant filed a pro se notice
    of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
    In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s
    permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant
    has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the
    defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports
    the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.
    See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of
    appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-
    bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal
    without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
    pending motions as moot.
    2
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-18-01076-CR

Filed Date: 4/2/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/3/2019