David Bradley Newton v. State ( 2015 )

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 29, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01452-CR
DAVID BRADLEY NEWTON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F11-72170-P
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Brown and Stoddart
Opinion by Justice Brown
David Bradley Newton was convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. This appeal
follows the revocation of his community supervision and the imposition of his ten-year sentence.
On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect,
there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex.
Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised
appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v.
State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts
and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
141452F.U05
-2-
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DAVID BRADLEY NEWTON, Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District
Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
F11-72170-P).
No. 05-14-01452-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Chief
Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered July 29, 2015.
-3-