Ex Parte James H. Stone, Sr. ( 1998 )


Menu:
  • Ex Parte James H. Stone, Sr.






      IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


    No. 10-98-017-CR

     

    EX PARTE JAMES H. STONE, SR.

     

                                           


    From the 12th District Court

    Madison County, Texas

    Trial Court # 9272-W3

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

          James H. Stone appeals from the trial court’s denial of his application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 1998). The court held a hearing on the merits of Stone’s application and then denied the relief requested.

          A defendant has no right to appeal the denial of a post-conviction application for habeas relief filed pursuant to article 11.07. Ex parte Williams, 169 Tex. Crim. 96, 331 S.W.2d 940, 940 (1960); Ex parte Cross, 288 S.W.2d 507, 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956); Ex parte Prosser, 149 Tex. Crim. 319, 320-21, 194 S.W.2d 89, 89 (1946); cf. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868-69 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (defendant may appeal denial on merits of post-conviction habeas application filed pursuant to article V, section 8 of the Texas Constitution). Rather, the writ must be made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals, which has the authority to review the matter as an original proceeding. See Ex parte Jones, 957 S.W.2d 849, 849 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).

          Stone’s avenue for relief from the trial court’s denial of his application lies with the Court of Criminal Appeals and not this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

     

                                                                                   PER CURIAM


    Before Chief Justice Davis,

                Justice Cummings, and

                Justice Vance

    Dismissed for want of jurisdiction

    Opinion delivered and filed March 18, 1998

    Do not publish