Country Title , L.L.C. v. Morenike Jaiyeoba ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                               ACCEPTED
    01-14-00931-cv
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    12/31/2014 2:18:49 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    01-14-00931-CV
    FILED IN
    1st COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS               HOUSTON, TEXAS
    12/31/2014 2:18:49 PM
    FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    HOUSTON, TEXAS                         Clerk
    COUNTRY TITLE, L.L.C.
    Appellant
    V.
    MORENIKE JAIYEOBA
    Appellee
    APPELLANT’S RESPONSE TO
    APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellant Country Title, L.L.C. (“Country Title”) files this Response to
    Appellee Morenike Jaiyeoba’s (“Jaiyeoba”) Motion to Dismiss Appeal and would
    respectfully show this Court as follows:
    I.
    Summary of the Argument
    The Texas Supreme Court and multiple intermediate appellate courts have
    consistently held that a corporation that has ceased to exist can pursue an appeal of
    a judgment. Jaiyeoba seeks a dismissal of Country Title’s appeal based solely on
    1
    02929.825 / 1708490.1
    the erroneous contention that Country Title cannot pursue this appeal because it
    had its right to transact business forfeited pursuant to the Texas Tax Code
    §171.252. Appellee’s motion is utterly without merit and contrary to well
    established case law.
    II.
    Argument & Authorities
    In Vanscot Concrete Co. v. Bailey, the Texas Supreme Court held that
    Vanscot, irrespective of its existence, had the right to appeal the trial court’s
    judgment against it after the corporation’s charter had been forfeited. 
    853 S.W.2d 525
    , 1993 Tex. LEXIS 67, 36 Tex. Sup. J. 928 (Tex. 1993). The Texas Supreme
    Court held that extinguished corporations have a right to appeal a judgment against
    them and explained that "the reasoning for allowing a corporation which has
    ceased to exist to prosecute an appeal is applicable in any circumstance." 
    Id. at 526
    (emphasis added).
    Relying upon Vanscot, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals confirmed that the
    forfeiture of a corporate charter under the Tax Code does not prevent a corporation
    from pursuing an appeal. Cruse v. O'Quinn, 
    273 S.W.3d 766
    , 2008 Tex. App.
    LEXIS 8990 (Tex. App. Houston 14th Dist. 2008, pet. denied). Quoting the Texas
    Supreme Court, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals explained that "corporations have
    the same right to have judgments against them revised by the appellate courts as
    2
    02929.825 / 1708490.1
    have persons, and that even extinguished corporations are entitled to a hearing
    before the appellate courts." 
    Id. (citing Vanscot,
    853 S.W.2d at 526).
    Likewise, the Thirteenth Court of Appeals reached the same conclusion and
    held that the forfeiture of a corporate charter under the tax code does not prevent a
    corporation from appealing an adverse judgment against it. Suntide Sandpit, Inc. v.
    H & H Sand & Gravel, Inc., 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 5870, 
    2012 WL 2929605
    , at
    *12 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2012, pet. denied). The Corpus Christi Court of
    Appeals noted that case law plainly established that a corporation has the right to
    appeal a judgment against it. 
    Id. The Court
    further noted that the law is well
    established that defunct corporations still have the right to defend claims brought
    against them which includes an appeal. Id
    Appellee cites no authority to the contrary. As such, Appellant Country
    Title, LLC respectfully requests that this Court deny Appellee’s Motion to
    Dismiss.
    III.
    Request for Attorney’s Fees
    Appellant Country Title, LLC requests that this Court award Country Title,
    LLC its attorney’s fees incurred in preparing a response to Appellee’s baseless
    Motion to Dismiss. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 9.002, et. seq.
    Appellee filed the Motion to Dismiss on December 23, 2014. A few hours after
    filing, Appellant provided Appellee’s counsel with the case law establishing
    3
    02929.825 / 1708490.1
    Country Title, LLC’s right to appeal and requested that the motion be withdrawn.
    Appellee provided no response and as such, has chosen to proceed with its
    meritless motion. As such, Country Title requests that this court award it $750 in
    attorney’s fees incurred as a result of preparing a response to the Motion to
    Dismiss.
    PRAYER
    WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant, Country Title,
    L.L.C., prays that this Court deny Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal, award it
    $750 in attorney’s fees incurred in preparing a response to the Motion to Dismiss,
    and for any such further relief to which it may be entitled.
    Respectfully submitted,
    LeClairRyan
    By: /s/ James J. McConn_________________
    Brianne W. Richardson
    State Bar No. 24056500
    Email: brianne.richardson@leclairryan.com
    James J. McConn
    State Bar No. 13439700
    Email: james.mcconn@leclairryan.com
    Leslee N. Haas
    State Bar No. 24041031
    E-Mail: leslee.haas@leclairryan.com
    1233 West Loop South, Suite 1000
    Houston, Texas 77027
    Telephone: 713-654-1111
    Facsimile: 713-650-0027
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT,
    COUNTRY TITLE, L.L.C.
    4
    02929.825 / 1708490.1
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I certify
    that I have served this document on all other parties which are listed below on
    December 31, 2014 as follows:
    L. T. “Butch” Bradt
    Betsy L. Grubbs
    Teltschik-Grubbs, P.L.L.C.
    14014 Southwest Freeway, Suite 4
    Sugar Land, Texas 77478
    /s/ James J. McConn______________
    James J. McConn, Jr.
    5
    02929.825 / 1708490.1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-14-00931-CV

Filed Date: 12/31/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2016