Jerry Lee Banks v. State ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • In The



    Court of Appeals



    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



    ____________________



    NO. 09-06-412 CR

    ____________________



    JERRY LEE BANKS, Appellant



    V.



    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




    On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

    Jefferson County, Texas

    Trial Cause No. 86104




    MEMORANDUM OPINION

    Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Jerry Lee Banks pled no contest to assault on a family member. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Banks guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Banks on community supervision for four years, and assessed a fine of $750. On May 5, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Banks's unadjudicated community supervision. Banks pled "true" to violating one of the conditions of the community supervision order. The trial court found that Banks violated the conditions of his community supervision, found Banks guilty of assault on a family member, and assessed punishment at seven years of confinement.

    Banks's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On December 14, 2006, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)  

    AFFIRMED.

    _________________________________

    HOLLIS HORTON

    Justice

    Submitted on April 6, 2007

    Opinion Delivered April 18, 2007

    Do Not Publish



    Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.  

    1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-06-00412-CR

Filed Date: 4/18/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015