Ex Parte Edward Holland ( 2007 )

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-06-533 CR NO. 09-06-534 CR ____________________

EX PARTE EDWARD HOLLAND

---

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 83949-A and 88140-A

---

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 21, 2006, we informed the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notices of appeal, and notified them that the appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals. Responses demonstrating our jurisdiction have not been filed.

The notices of appeal seek to appeal the Court of Criminal Appeals' dismissal of appellant's applications for writs of habeas corpus. Orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals are not appealable to this Court.

Accordingly, we hold the orders from which the appellant appeals are not appealable. The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

____________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Opinion Delivered January 17, 2007

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.