Union Carbide Corporation v. Jack Loftin ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • In The



    Court of Appeals



    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

    ____________________



    NO. 09-08-061 CV

    ____________________



    UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellants



    V.



    JACK LOFTIN, ET AL., Appellees




    On Appeal from the 128th District Court

    Orange County, Texas

    Trial Cause Nos. A-070037-C; AC; BC; CC; DC; EC




    MEMORANDUM OPINION


    CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., (n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and sued as Hoechst Celanese Chemical, Inc.) and Celanese Americas Corporation filed a motion to dismiss their appeal as to Gerald Diaz and Deborah Diaz. CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and Celanese Americas Corporation wish to maintain their accelerated appeal of the denial of their motions to transfer venue as to all of the other plaintiffs in the underlying suit. Other parties also filed notice of appeal but have not joined the motion to dismiss filed by CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and Celanese Americas Corporation. The motion is voluntarily made by these appellants prior to any decision of this Court and should be granted. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No party filed an objection to the motion to dismiss filed by CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and Celanese Americas Corporation. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals of CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and Celanese Americas Corporation are dismissed as to Gerald Diaz and Deborah Diaz. The appeals by CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Ltd., Celanese International Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemicals, Inc., n/k/a Celanese International Corporation and Celanese Americas Corporation of the denial of their motions to transfer venue as to all other plaintiffs in the underlying suit shall continue. The appeal remains on the Court's active docket. Except as to parties whose appeals were discontinued by Memorandum Opinion delivered April 3, 2008, the appeal shall proceed as to all parties that filed notice of appeal.

    APPEAL DISMISSED.



    PER CURIAM



    Opinion Delivered June 5, 2008

    Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-08-00061-CV

Filed Date: 6/5/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015