Gaylon Davis v. State ( 2014 )

Order entered December 30, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01374-CR
GAYLON DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F12-33585-K
ORDER
The Court has before it appellant’s pro se request for appointment of counsel to pursue
the appeal. The clerk’s record reflects that sentence was imposed in absentia on August 22,
2014. It appears from a docket sheet entry and a “notice of disposition” that appellant was
sentenced in open court on September 30, 2014 after he was returned to custody. The clerk’s
record, however, does not contain a judgment reflecting the September 30, 2014 sentencing date.
The trial court certified that appellant has the right to appeal, and appellant filed a pro se notice
of appeal on October 8, 2014.
Absent certain exceptions that do not appear to apply to this case, the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure requires that sentence be pronounced in open court in the defendant’s
presence. See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 42.03, § 1(a) (West Supp. 2014). Thus, the
operative date for appellate purposes appears to be September 30, 2014. See Pruitt v. State, 737
S.W.2d 622, 622–23 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 1987, pet. ref’d); see also Williams v. State, No. 05-
05-00182-CR, 2005 WL 2841259, at *3 (Tex. App.––Dallas Oct. 31, 2005, no pet.) (not
designated for publication).
The front cover of the clerk’s record lists Carl N. White as appellant’s counsel. The
record reflects Mr. White served as trial counsel for appellant. Appellant filed a pro se notice of
appeal, and there is no separate order appointing Mr. White as appellate counsel. Additionally,
the reporter’s record is overdue.
Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing and to make findings
regarding the following:
 Whether the judgment accurately reflects the date sentence was imposed in open
court with the defendant present.
 Whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court appointed counsel. If appellant
is indigent, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel to represent appellant in
this appeal.
 If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, the trial court shall determine
whether appellant has retained counsel to represent him on appeal. If appellant
has retained counsel, the trial court shall make a finding as to the name, State Bar
number, and contact information for retained counsel.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) whether appellant requested preparation
of the reporter’s record; (2) the name of each court reporter who recorded
proceedings in the case; and (3) the date by which the complete reporter’s record
will be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its written findings of fact, any
supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of
this order. If the trial court finds that the judgment does not reflect the correct sentencing date,
the supplemental record shall contain a judgment that accurately reflects the date sentence was
pronounced in open court with appellant present.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN
JUSTICE