in Re: Larry Brown and JBS Carriers, Inc. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-18-00295-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                       §
    LARRY BROWN AND JBS CARRIERS,                                §    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    INC.,
    §
    RELATORS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Larry Brown and JBS Carriers, Inc. filed an original mandamus proceeding to challenge
    Respondent’s order striking their Chapter 18 counter-affidavit.1 On March 5, 2019, this Court
    conditionally granted the petition and directed Respondent to vacate his October 1, 2018, order
    granting Josue Saucedo’s motion to strike the controverting affidavit of Jana Schieber and issue an
    order denying the motion. By an order signed on March 27, Respondent complied with this Court’s
    opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of
    mandamus as moot.
    Opinion delivered April 10, 2019.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    1
    Respondent is the Honorable Robert K. Inselmann, Jr., Judge of the 217th Judicial District Court in Angelina
    County, Texas. Josue Saucedo is the Real Party in Interest.
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    APRIL 10, 2019
    NO. 12-18-00295-CV
    LARRY BROWN AND JBS CARRIERS, INC.,
    Relators
    V.
    HON. ROBERT K. INSELMANN, JR.,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Larry
    Brown and JBS Carriers, Inc.; who are the relators in appellate cause number 12-18-00295-CV
    and parties to trial court cause number CV-00030-18-01, pending on the docket of the 217th
    Judicial District Court of Angelina County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having
    been filed herein on October 25, 2018, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the
    opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED
    and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed
    as moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-18-00295-CV

Filed Date: 4/10/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/12/2019