Jack Lamar Taylor v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •              In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-19-00059-CR
    ___________________________
    JACK LAMAR TAYLOR, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    On Appeal from the 372nd District Court
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 0908137D
    Before Pittman, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Jack Lamar Taylor, also known as Michael Taylor, attempts to appeal
    his May 2004 burglary conviction and sentence. Because we have no jurisdiction, we
    dismiss this appeal.
    A repeat offender, Appellant pled guilty to burglary of a habitation in exchange
    for an eight-year sentence. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.42(b), 30.02(a)(1), (c)(2).
    The trial court convicted and sentenced Appellant on May 5, 2004, and he did not file
    a motion for new trial. Accordingly, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due by June 4,
    2004, but he did not file it until February 7, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)
    (providing that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of sentencing absent
    a timely motion for new trial). Appellant’s notice of appeal was therefore filed more
    than fourteen years too late. See 
    id. We informed
    Appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over
    this appeal because his notice of appeal was untimely filed. See Tex. R. App. P.
    26.2(a). We stated that the appeal would be subject to dismissal absent a response
    showing grounds for continuing it. We have not received a response.
    A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to
    vest this court with jurisdiction over an appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. The Texas
    Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that without a timely filed notice of
    appeal, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal. Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    ,
    522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
    2
    Because Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal too late, we dismiss this
    appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
    Per Curiam
    Do Not Publish
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    Delivered: April 11, 2019
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-19-00059-CR

Filed Date: 4/11/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/13/2019