Brad and Randi Aery, and the House Intervenors Lloyd House, Robert Eugene House, Magdalen House, Judith Ann House, Wayne House, Jimmy R. House, Edna Pawelek Ulbrich, Peter Pawelek, Jesse Pawelek, Ruby Pawelek Schumacher, Elizabeth Pawalek Reigh, Roy Mitch v. Hoskins, Inc. ( 2015 )

-·-· -··- - ..... -· -------~ ----'--- - ----------------.......,
CAUSE NO. M-12-0045-CV -A
BRAD AERY and RANDI AERY, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
FILEDOF
IN
Plaintiffs, and § 4th COURT OF APPEALS
§ SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
J. L. HOUSE TRUST, ET AL. § 05/20/2015 4:00:54 PM
Intervenors and Third-Party Plai·ntiffs, § KEITH E. HOTTLE
§ Clerk
vs. § MCMULLEN COUNTY, TEXAS
§
; · · c·~c·•rs``voF
HOSKINS, INC., C. CLIFTON HOSKINS,
ETAL.
Defendants, and
§
§
§
f4\.
w ~ ·i ~-- FILED IN
4th COURT OF APPEALS
i: -: ANTONIO,.nTEXAS f; RECORO[D
§ SAN
AURORA RESOURCES CORPORATION, § u :
05/20/2015
1' ~ ·::. ~ •
.' ·.· 4:00:54 PM
0
ARMADILLO E&P, iNC., formerly known § ``· ·.:, . KEITH E. HOTTLE
as Texoz E&P i'I, INC., TEXOZ E&P I, §
·~ ,. •.. .., . -..... ,,
r ''• • `` i • •• ·' • . Clerk
.. •.. ~ )·
r f"~. 'Il ''-Y.
I : ·. : '~ I '
INC., SEA EAGLE FORD, LLC, §
SUNDANCE ENERGY, INC., and KEBO §
OIL & GAS, INC. § 36TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Third-Party Defendants §
AGREED ORDER DISMISSING
• TEXOZ E&P i, INC.'S AND AURORA RESOURCES CORPORATION'S
CROSS-CLAIMS FOR CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Currently pending before the Court are Third-Party Defend~t Texo? E&P I,
Inc.'s ("Texoz I") Cross-Claim for Contribution against Cross-Defendants C. Clifton Hoskins,
Lee Ann Kulka, Lee Roy Hoskins, III, Andrea Jurica, Blake Hoskins, Brent Hoskins, Leonl»'d
Hoskins, and Hazel Q. Hoskins, in her capacity as trustee of the Hazel Q. Hoskins Living
Revocable Trust; and Aurora. Resources Corp.'s ("Aurora") Cross-Claim for Contribution
against Cross-Defendants C. Clifton Hoskins, Blake C. Hoskins, Brent C. Hoskins, Lee Roy
Hos~ins, III, Jane W. Hoskins, Andrea Jurica, Lee Ann Kulka, Leonard Hoskins, and Hazel Q.
Hoskins, individually and as trustee of the Hazel Q. Hoskins Living Revocable Trust (the
"Cross-Claims").
The Court's previous rulings have rendered the Cross-Claims MOOt.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Texoz I's and Aurora's Cross-(;la1ms be
Exhibit C 01..685
. . . .
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject to the resolution of this case by the Court of
Appeals.
..;;- ~bv--
SIGNED thi s~) day of Se~tember, 2014.
``~ .
JUDGE PRESID~ A~
•
• 2
01686