Diane Martinez v. Romeo Martinez ( 2005 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed December 8, 2005

     

     

    Opinion filed December 8, 2005

     

     

     

                                                                            In The

                                                                                 

        Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                       __________

     

                                                              No. 11-05-00199-CV

                                                        __________

     

                                          DIANE MARTINEZ, Appellant

     

                                                                 V.

     

                                          ROMEO MARTINEZ, Appellee

     

      

     

                                      On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

     

                                                               Ector County, Texas

     

                                                  Trial Court Cause No. CC2-17,646

     

      

     

                                                 M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

     


    This is an appeal from a divorce decree.  We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

    The trial court signed the decree on June 21, 2005.  Diane Martinez timely perfected an appeal.  A motion for new trial was not filed.  The clerk=s record was filed in this court on September 22, 2005; and the reporter=s record was filed on September 23, 2005.  Diane=s brief was originally due to be filed in this court on or before October 24, 2005.  This court on its own motion extended the due date to December 1, 2005. In our letter of November 1, 2005, extending the due date, Diane was informed that the failure to file her brief by the new December 1 due date may result in the dismissal of her appeal for want of prosecution.  Diane has failed to file either a brief or a motion for extension of time.

    Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3.

     

    PER CURIAM

     

    December 8, 2005

    Not designated for publication. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(a).

    Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J., and

    McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-05-00199-CV

Filed Date: 12/8/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021