in the Matter of F.J.R. ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed July 2, 2009
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ___________
    No. 11-07-00342-CV
    __________
    IN THE MATTER OF F.J.R.
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law sitting as Juvenile Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 5619
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    The jury found that F.J.R. engaged in delinquent conduct by committing the offense of sexual
    assault. The trial court committed appellant to the care and custody of the Texas Youth Commission
    for an indeterminate period of time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday. We affirm.
    The record reflects that appellant filed a motion for the appointment of an interpreter and that
    the motion was granted. The record further reflects that the same “certified, qualified, State-
    authorized interpreter” was present in the courtroom and assisted appellant throughout the
    proceedings without objection.
    In his sole issue on appeal, appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error
    because the interpreter was not given an oath until appellant was sworn in as the final witness in the
    three-day trial. The State argues that appellant has failed to preserve his complaint for appellate
    review. We agree.
    The record before this court is silent as to the oath administered to the interpreter. During
    pretrial proceedings, the trial court described the interpreter as a “certified, qualified, State-
    authorized     interpreter.”   The same interpreter served appellant throughout the trial court
    proceedings.
    Failure to timely object results in failure to preserve a complaint for appellate review.
    TEX . R. APP . P. 33. The waiver applies to failure to object to an unsworn witness or an interpreter.
    Beck v. State, 
    719 S.W.2d 205
    , 213 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Castillo v. State, 
    807 S.W.2d 8
    (Tex.
    App.—Corpus Christi 1991, pet. ref’d); Lara v. State, 
    761 S.W.2d 481
    (Tex. App.—Eastland 1988,
    no pet.). The issue is overruled.
    The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
    JIM R. WRIGHT
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    July 2, 2009
    Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP . P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    McCall, J., and Strange, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-07-00342-CV

Filed Date: 7/2/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2015