eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Appeals of Texas
 2005-11

Christopher Lemar Robinson v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:

  • Opinion issued November 17, 2005  

     









    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The  

    First District of Texas

    ____________


    NO. 01-04-01149-CR

    ____________


    CHRISTOPHER LEMARK ROBINSON, Appellant  


    V.


    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




    On Appeal from the 179th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 971865



     

    MEMORANDUM OPINION  

                   Appellant, Christopher Lemark Robinson, pleaded guilty to the state jail felony offense of possession of marihuana, without an agreed recommendation as to punishment with the State. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at confinement for two years. We affirm.

                   Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit. Counsel’s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref’d).

                   Counsel represents that he served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

                   We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).

                   All pending motions are denied as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Alcala and Bland.

    Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).