-
Opinion issued April 13, 2006
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00269-CR
____________
IN RE JOSEPH H. STEWART, III, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINIONRelator, Joseph H. Stewart, III, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that respondent has not provided him with an appointed attorney to assist him in the preparation of a request for DNA testing. We deny relief.
There are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely: (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent has refused.
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings and Alcala.
Document Info
Docket Number: 01-06-00269-CR
Filed Date: 4/13/2006
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/2/2015