Bobby David Punch v. State ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued June 7, 2007













    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ____________



    NO. 01-06-00338-CR

    ____________



    BOBBY DAVID PUNCH, Appellant



    V.



    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




    On Appeal from the 177th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 1036226




    MEMORANDUM OPINION  

    Appellant, Bobby David Punch, was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 45 years. We affirm.

    Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit. Counsel's brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of arguable grounds of error. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd).

    Counsel represents that he served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.

    We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1) See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).

    Any pending motions are denied as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Bland.

    Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

    1. Counsel has a duty to inform appellant of the result of his appeal and also to inform him that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-06-00338-CR

Filed Date: 6/7/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015