eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Appeals of Texas
 2007-04

Jonathan Lee Reagins v. State ( 2007 )


Menu:

  • Opinion issued April 12, 2007















    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ____________



    NO. 01-06-00281-CR

    ____________



    JONATHAN LEE REAGINS, Appellant



    V.



    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

    On Appeal from the 228th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 1034772



    MEMORANDUM OPINION  

    Appellant, Jonathan Lee Reagins, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated robbery, without an agreed recommendation as to punishment with the State, and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 20 years. We affirm.

    Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref'd).

    The brief states that a copy was delivered to appellant, whom counsel advised by letter of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous.

    We affirm the judgment of the trial court. (1)  

    Any pending motions are denied as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Keyes, and Higley.

    Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

    1. Counsel has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and also to inform appellant that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).