Sharla McHale v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •  

    Opinion issued June 3, 2010

      

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ————————————

    NO. 01-10-00061-CR

    ———————————

    Sharla McHale, Appellant

    V.

    The State of Texas, Appellee

     

     

    On Appeal from the 228th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Case No. 1233833

     

     

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

              We lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal.  Appellant, Sharla McHale, pleaded guilty, with an agreed recommendation as to punishment with the State, to the offense of theft from person.  Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the State abandoned the two enhancement paragraphs contained in the indictment, and requested the court to sentence appellant to confinement for 90 days under Section 12.44 (a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.  12.44 (a) (Vernon Supp. 2009).  In accordance with her plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years.  

              After the trial court sentenced appellant to punishment that fell within the terms of the plea bargain agreement, the trial court certified that this case is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right to appeal.  Appellant did not request the trial court's permission to appeal any pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for appellant to appeal. Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal. 

              We conclude that the certification of right of appeal filed by the trial court is supported by the record and that appellant has no right of appeal due to the agreed plea bargain.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a).  Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal "without further action."  Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

              Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

              We deny any pending motions as moot.  

                                                    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks and Higley.

    Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-10-00061-CR

Filed Date: 6/3/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015