Michael Henry Wright v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Opinion to: SR TJ EVK ERA GCH LCH JB JS MM TGT

    Opinion issued April 1, 2010

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

     

     

     

     

     

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

     

     


    NO. 01-08-00925-CR

     

     


    MICHAEL HENRY WRIGHT, Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

      

     


    On Appeal from the 248th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 1172742

     

      

     


    MEMORANDUM OPINION

    In his sole issue, Michael Henry Wright, appellant, contends the trial court’s judgment erroneously reflects that he was convicted of the first degree felony of aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14. Appellant requests that we modify the judgment to show he was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact.  The State agrees that the judgment should be modified.    

    The record shows appellant was initially charged with the first degree felony of aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14 that occurred on or about February 17, 2007.  Appellant pleaded guilty without an agreed recommendation to the reduced charge of second degree indecency with a child by contact.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon Supp. 2009).  Although there is no dispute appellant pleaded guilty and was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact, the judgment erroneously reflects he was convicted of first degree felony aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14.

              We modify the judgment to show appellant was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact, and affirm the judgment, as modified.  See St. Julian v. State, 132 S.W.3d 512, 517 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).

     

     

     

    CONCLUSION

              As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

     

     

                                                              Elsa Alcala

                                                              Justice

     

    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Alcala and Higley.

     

    Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-08-00925-CR

Filed Date: 4/1/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015