Lacey Odell Taylor v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed April 18, 2019
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-18-00258-CR
    __________
    LACEY ODELL TAYLOR, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 70th District Court
    Ector County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. A-16-1454-CR
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    The jury convicted Lacey Odell Taylor of two counts of tampering with
    physical evidence: the first count related to a human corpse and the second related
    to cleaning the crime scene. Appellant pleaded true to an enhancement allegation,
    and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for sixty years for the first count
    and twenty years for the second count. We affirm.
    Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to
    withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and
    conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the
    appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of
    the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record
    and the reporter’s record. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to review the record
    and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to
    file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal
    Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed
    counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 
    252 S.W.3d 403
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1991).
    Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the
    procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the
    record, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.1
    We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgments of the
    trial court.
    PER CURIAM
    April 18, 2019
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.2
    Willson, J., not participating.
    1
    We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R.
    APP. P. 68.
    2
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-18-00258-CR

Filed Date: 4/18/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/20/2019