in Re: Susan Harriman ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-18-00770-CV
    IN RE SUSAN HARRIMAN, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11994
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart
    Opinion by Justice Stoddart
    Before the Court are relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and relator’s “Motion to
    Dismiss and Vacate Trial Court Order.” In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial
    court’s June 29, 2018 order on motion to expand forensic examination. The parties have now
    settled the underlying dispute, and the trial court has signed an “Order of Non-Suit with Prejudice”
    and dismissed all claims at issue in this original proceeding. In her motion, relator requests that
    this Court vacate the trial court’s forensic examination order, dismiss this original proceeding, and
    order the parties to bear their own costs.
    When a trial court dismisses an action pursuant to a notice of non-suit, a temporary order
    rendered during the pendency of the cause automatically dissolves by operation of law without
    further order of the trial court and renders appellate proceedings related to the order moot. Gen.
    Land Office v. OXY U.S.A., Inc., 
    789 S.W.2d 569
    , 571 (Tex. 1990) (when trial court dismisses
    lawsuit, temporary injunction is automatically dissolved); Goodman v. Hill, No. 05-13-01313-CV,
    
    2014 WL 1576969
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 21, 2014, no pet.) (“The trial court’s dismissal
    of the underlying action automatically dissolved the temporary injunction, rendering the issues in
    this appeal moot.”).
    Here, the trial court’s dismissal automatically dissolved the order of which relator
    complains. This controversy is, therefore, moot and must be dismissed. See Gen. Land. Office,
    789 S.W.2d at 572. Accordingly, we deny relator’s request for an order vacating the trial court’s
    forensic examination order, grant relator’s motion to dismiss, and dismiss this original proceeding
    as moot without reaching the merits of the petition for writ of mandamus.
    /Craig Stoddart/
    CRAIG STODDART
    JUSTICE
    180770F.P05
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-18-00770-CV

Filed Date: 12/12/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2018