Ex Parte Adam Wayne Ingram ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    November 18, 2015
    No. 04-15-00459-CR
    Ex Parte Adam Wayne INGRAM,
    Appellant
    From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2015W0279
    Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On January 5, 2015, Appellant filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. He
    raised facial constitutional challenges to Texas Penal Code Section 33.021, the statute under
    which he was indicted. The trial court’s February 5, 2015 order denied the application. The
    order states the trial court decided the application on its merits, but the State acknowledges the
    trial court signed the order without holding a hearing on the application.
    The State argues Appellant had thirty days from February 5, 2015, to file a post-judgment
    motion or notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte Matthews, 
    452 S.W.3d 8
    , 13 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014,
    no pet.); Green v. State, 
    999 S.W.2d 474
    , 476 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, pet. ref’d).
    On July 14, 2015, Appellant filed another application for writ of habeas corpus seeking
    relief on what appears to be the identical bases asserted in the January 5, 2015 application. At
    the same time, Appellant filed a motion to set aside the February 5, 2015 order. In the motion,
    Appellant asserts the trial court inadvertently signed the February 5, 2015 order denying his
    January 5, 2015 application, and he did not receive notice of the February 5, 2015 order. The
    trial court denied the July 14, 2015 application, and on July 16, 2015, Appellant filed a notice of
    appeal.
    In its brief, citing State v. Swearingen, 
    424 S.W.3d 32
    , 36 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), the
    State argues Appellant’s counsel received notice, and this court does not have jurisdiction to
    consider this appeal “because no timely notice of appeal was filed after the trial court’s denial of
    Appellant’s first application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus” and the denial was “final and
    became the law of the case.”
    We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TWENTY DAYS from the date
    of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 
    Castillo, 369 S.W.3d at 198
    ; 
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522
    . If Appellant does not show cause in writing within the
    time provided, this appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3(a).
    PER CURIAM
    ATTESTED TO: ____________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00459-CR

Filed Date: 11/18/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016