Arlington Surgicare Partners, Ltd. D/B/A Baylor Surgicare at Arlington v. CFLS Investments, LLC ( 2015 )
Menu:
-
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00090-CV ARLINGTON SURGICARE APPELLANTS PARTNERS, LTD. D/B/A BAYLOR SURGICARE AT ARLINGTON; JONATHAN BOND; CAROLYN EXLEY; BRETT BRODNAX; ARLINGTON ORTHOPEDIC AND SPINE HOSPITAL, LLC D/B/A BAYLOR ORTHOPEDIC AND SPINE HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON, LTD.; BAYLOR HEALTH SERVICES; USP TEXAS, L.P.; USP NORTH TEXAS, INC.; UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.; TEXAS HEALTH VENTURES GROUP, LLC; THVG ARLINGTON GP, LLC; AND TEXAS HEALTH VENTURE ARLINGTON HOSPITAL, LLC V. CFLS INVESTMENTS, LLC; JOE T. APPELLEES SOUTHERLAND, DPM; RICHARD ALAN CARTER, DO; JANIS R. CORNWELL, MD; LINNIE V. RABJOHN, DPM; JOHN R. LANDRY, DPM; FROESCHKE INVESTMENTS, LTD.; ZOEZY 1 SUPERSTAR GP, LLC; THE WALKER GROUP, LP; WONG FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC; FALLOPIAN DISASTER HOLDINGS, LP; MATLOCK OB- GYN ASSOCIATES, PA; AND DAVID B. GRAYBILL, DO ---------- FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 352-264845-13 ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND ORDER ---------- We have considered the “Petition for Permission To Appeal Order Denying Partial Summary Judgment Filed By The USPI/Baylor Defendants,” as well as all responses, replies, and the trial court’s March 17, 2015 amended order permitting the USPI/Baylor Defendants’ interlocutory appeal. See Tex. R. App. 28.3(a), (f). We GRANT the petition to the extent that, as indicated in the trial court’s March 17, 2015 amended order, “the issue of the General Partner’s ability to consent to the Doctor Defendant’s investment in the BOSHA hospital under the first sentence of Section 12.1 of the Partnership Agreement presents a controlling question of law to which there is a substantial ground for disagreement.” See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f) (West 2015); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 In this appeal, the USPI/Baylor Defendants will be known as the Appellants, and their notice of appeal is deemed filed today. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). This appeal shall be governed by the rules for accelerated appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.1, 28.3(k). Also, Appellants shall file a copy of this order with the trial court’s clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). The clerk’s record and reporter’s record are due on or before Friday, May 26, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 35.1(b). Appellants’ brief will be due twenty days after the appellate record is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). The Appellees’ brief will be due twenty days after the filing of the Appellants’ brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b). The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to the attorneys of record, the trial court, the court reporter, and the trial court clerk. DATED May 14, 2015. PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DAUPHINOT, J. would dismiss. 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 02-15-00090-CV
Filed Date: 5/18/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 5/18/2015