State v. James Norman Evans ( 2015 )

COURT OF APPEALS SANDEE BRYAN MARION FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. HOTTLE CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF COURT KAREN ANGELINI 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 MARIALYN BARNARD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 REBECA C. MARTINEZ WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX TELEPHONE PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ (210) 335-2635 LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA JASON PULLIAM FACSIMILE NO. JUSTICES (210) 335-2762 Thursday, May 14, 2015 John Hoover Wallace T. Ferguson 200 Earl Garrett, Suite 202 Ferguson & Hix Kerrville, TX 78028 P.O. Box 1106 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Boerne, TX 78006 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-15-00189-CR, 04-15-00190-CR and 04- 15-00191-CR Trial Court Case Number: 5623, 5624, snf 5643 Style: The State of Texas v. James Norman Evans Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has issued in reference to the above styled and numbered causes. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK _______________________ Carmen De Leon Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53262 James Norman EvansAppellee Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Thursday, May 14, 2015 No. 04-15-00189-CR The STATE of Texas, Appellant v. James Norman EVANS, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 5623 Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding ORDER On April 7, 2015, the State filed a motion to consolidate these appeals. The State served the appellee with a copy of the motion, and the appellee has not objected. We agree that, in the interest of efficient administration, they should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument. We, therefore, ORDER Nos. 04-15-00189-CR, 04-11-00190-CR, and 04-11-00191-CR consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument on appeal. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put all appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does not extend the briefing schedule. _________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of May, 2015. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court