Peter Barton v. Ana Lisa Garza ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                Ana Lisa
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 4, 2014
    No. 04-14-00207-CV
    Peter BARTON,
    Appellant
    v.
    Ana Lisa GARZA,
    Appellee
    From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas
    Trial Court No. DC-12-308
    Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Clerk’s Record
    On March 31, 2014, a partial clerk’s record was filed. On May 27, 2014, the trial court
    clerk filed a notification of late record stating appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. On
    May 29, 2014, we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that the clerk’s fee had
    been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s fee. On May 30, 2014, appellant
    filed a letter and a copy of a receipt showing he had paid for the clerk’s record. On June 2, 2014,
    the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record.
    Late Notice of Appeal and Motion to Dismiss
    On April 8, 2014, we ordered appellant to offer a reasonable explanation for filing a late
    notice of appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). On April 10, 2014,
    appellee filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that this appeal must be dismissed because appellant
    cannot provide a reasonable explanation for filling a late notice of appeal. Appellee points out
    that appellant’s notice of appeal states that the trial court’s final judgment was signed on January
    30, 2014, when in fact the final judgment was signed on November 25, 2013.
    “[A]ny plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to file . . . was not
    deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertance, mistake, or mischance, [would] be
    accepted as a reasonable explanation.” Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 
    774 S.W.2d 668
    , 670
    (Tex. 1989); see also Dimotsis v. State Farm Lloyds, 
    966 S.W.2d 657
    , 657 (Tex. App.CSan
    Antonio 1998, no pet.). Any conduct short of deliberate or intentional noncompliance qualifies as
    inadvertence, mistake or mischance, even if that conduct can also be characterized as
    professional negligence. 
    Garcia, 774 S.W.2d at 670
    ; 
    Dimotsis, 966 S.W.2d at 657
    . Appellant’s
    counsel timely responded to our order, explaining that the notice of appeal was filed late because
    he erroneously calculated the deadline for filing the notice of appeal from the date the motion for
    new trial was overruled. Appellant’s counsel further explained that he erroneously “put down”
    that the judgment was signed on January 30, 2014, which was the date the motion for new trial
    was overruled. The explanation is reasonable. 
    Dimotsis, 966 S.W.2d at 657
    -58 (concluding
    explanation for late notice of appeal was reasonable when appellant’s counsel erroneously
    calculated the perfection deadline by adding thirty days to the date the trial court overruled the
    motion for new trial).
    We, therefore, GRANT appellant’s implied motion for extension of time to file the notice
    of appeal and ORDER this appeal retained on the Court’s docket. Appellee’s motion to dismiss
    this appeal is DENIED.
    Reporter’s Record
    The appellate record was due in this appeal on March 25, 2014. On April 14, 2014, the
    court reporter, Ramiro Hernandez, filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant had
    not requested the reporter’s record. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1). We, therefore, ORDER appellant
    to file written proof in this court on or before June 16, 2014, that appellant has filed a
    designation of record with Ramiro Hernandez. We, therefore, FURTHER ORDER appellant to
    provide written proof to this court on or before June 16, 2014, that the reporter’s fee has been
    paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee.
    If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due
    within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those
    issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a
    decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
    _________________________________
    Karen Angelini, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 4th day of June, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00207-CV

Filed Date: 6/4/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015