State v. Farhad Nayeb ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                      3/9/2015 4:22 PM
    Cause No. 002-82555-2013
    FILED IN
    STATE OF TEXAS                           §              IN THE COUNTY
    5th COURTCOURT
    OF APPEALS
    §                      DALLAS, TEXAS
    v.                                       §                   3/10/2015 8:20:23 AM
    ATLAWN0.2                            .)
    §                         LISA MATZ ~               ?
    Clerk
    NOTIC:OF APPEA:OLLIN CO``r!Sl~
    FARHAD NAYEB
    :< \-,, ~   :Jt        17
    To the Honorable Judge of Said Court:                                  ~j r;:;.. ~    ":-?        -~
    ··-   :><                 '
    ; .,..,     c:>         '.P
    <    t/1      &"            ;...::::
    The State of Texas by and through her prosecuting attorney, Greg Willis,                       :z
    Collin County Criminal District Attorney, and within 20 days of the trial court's
    order files this written notice of appeal to the Fifth District Court of Appeals of
    Texas.
    The order appealed from is an order dismissing the complaint. See Tex.
    Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.0l(a)(I).
    Wherefore, premises considered, the State prays this notice of appeal be
    entered of record; and that further proceedings be stayed pending the disposition of
    this appeal.
    A copy of the foregoing has been served on Tom Keen, 555 Republic Dr.,
    Ste. 325, Plano, TX 75074 on this the    q~ay of ``                , 2015.
    Isl John Rolater
    Assistant Criminal District Attorney
    State's Notice of Appeal                                                                     1
    Cause No. 002-82555-2013
    STATE OF TEXAS                         §               IN THE COUNTY COURT
    §
    v.                                     §               ATLAWN0.2
    §
    FARHAD NAYEB                           §               COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
    ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
    The Court, having previously determined that City of Melissa Zoning
    Ordinance No. 92-08 is unconstitutionally vague because it does not give fair
    notice to citizens accused of violating the ordinance by cashing checks and/or
    transmitting money allegedly contrary to the permitted uses of a premises covered
    by the ordinance, hereby orders that the Complaint be, and it is hereby,
    DISMISSED. See Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d IO, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
    Entered this the _ii_ day of February, 2015.
    ~--,,,,Z``
    c13  alker, Judge Presiding
    Order                                                                          1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-15-00291-CR

Filed Date: 3/10/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2016