in Re: Lanaye Julian ( 2008 )

0
NUMBER 13-08-00363-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE LANAYE JULIAN
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Lanaye Julian, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency
motion to stay the underlying proceedings in the above cause on June 5, 2008, contending
that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a motion for protective order filed by the
real party in interest, Maurice Julian. That same day, this Court granted the motion for
emergency stay and ordered all proceedings in the trial court stayed. The Court requested
1
See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but
is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).
that the real party in interest, Maurice Julian, by and through counsel, file a response to
relators' petition for writ of mandamus on or before June 16, 2008, and his response has
been filed herein.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court is LIFTED. See TEX .
R. APP. P. 52.10(b) ("Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is
effective until the case is finally decided."). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
See id. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 19th day of June, 2008.
2