-
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00394-CR
____________
CHARLES ANTHONY BIVENS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 23rd District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 25,133
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a guilty plea, appellant was convicted of two counts of forgery. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, on August 16, 1993, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for six years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until April 24, 2002. Because we have no jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss.
To invoke an appellate court=s jurisdiction over an appeal, an appellant must give timely and proper notice of appeal. White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See id.
Moreover, appellant=s general notice of appeal did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Rule 25.2(b)(3) provides that when an appeal is from a judgment rendered on a defendant=s plea of guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal must: (1) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect; (2) specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial; or (3) state that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Id. The time for filing a proper notice of appeal has expired; thus, appellant may not file an amended notice of appeal to correct jurisdictional defects. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Because appellant=s notice of appeal did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3), we are without jurisdiction to consider any of appellant=s issues, including the voluntariness of the plea. See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (holding that appellant who files general notice of appeal may not appeal voluntariness of negotiated plea).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 16, 2002.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Anderson and Frost.
Do Not Publish ‑ Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: 14-02-00394-CR
Filed Date: 5/16/2002
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/12/2015