Martin Gerardo Rivas v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                    COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §
    MARTIN GERARDO RIVAS,                                           No. 08-18-00208-CR
    §
    Appellant,                                  Appeal from
    §
    v.                                                               41st District Court
    §
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                          of El Paso County, Texas
    §
    Appellee.                              (TC # 20180D02128)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Martin Gerardo Rivas, is attempting to appeal his conviction of theft of property
    valued at less than $2,500 with two or more previous theft convictions. See TEX.PENAL CODE
    ANN. § 31.03(e)(4)(D). We dismiss the appeal because the trial court certified that Appellant does
    not have a right to appeal.
    Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that the trial court enter
    its certification of a defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other
    appealable order. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, including
    the trial court’s certification as required by Rules 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d), but the certification
    reflects that the appeal “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The
    record supports the trial court’s conclusion that Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and
    entered a negotiated guilty plea. In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters
    raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to
    appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2)(A)(B). The appellate record does not reflect that the trial court
    ruled on any pre-trial motions or that Appellant obtained permission to appeal any issues.
    The Clerk’s Office notified Appellant that the certification reflects he has no right of appeal
    in this case and requested a response. Appellant’s attorney filed a response stating that he is unable
    to rebut the certification. Based on the trial court’s certification and the record before us, we
    conclude that Appellant does not have a right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
    December 19, 2018
    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
    (Do Not Publish)
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-18-00208-CR

Filed Date: 12/19/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/24/2018