Victor Borjas Soto A/K/A Victor Barjas Soto v. State ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

                                          COURT OF APPEALS

                                           SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                       FORT WORTH

     

     

                                            NO. 2-07-452-CR  

     

     

    VICTOR BORJAS SOTO

    A/K/A VICTOR BARJAS SOTO                                               APPELLANT

     

                                                       V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

     

                                                  ------------

     

               FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

     

                                                  ------------

     

                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

     

                                                  ------------


    On November 26, 2007, appellant Victor Borjas Soto a/k/a Victor Barjas Soto pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon pursuant to a plea bargain.  In accordance with the plea bargain, the trial court sentenced him to ten years= confinement.  Although appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in this court, the trial court=s certification of his right to appeal shows that this case Ais a plea-bargain case, and [appellant] has NO right of appeal.@

    On December 14, 2007, we sent a letter to appellant=s court-appointed counsel informing him of the trial court=s certification and giving appellant, or any party desiring to continue the appeal, until December 27, 2007 to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed unless we received such a response.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  On January 7, 2007, we received a letter from appellant=s counsel, in which he agreed that appellant has no right of appeal and dismissal is appropriate.

    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2005, no pet.).

     

                                                            PER CURIAM

    PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

    DO NOT PUBLISH

    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

     

    DELIVERED: February 7, 2008



    [1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-07-00452-CR

Filed Date: 2/7/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/4/2015