in Re: Donald Adkins ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                      UMS-©ol Z^-CfL
    tf*f
    IN RE,      DONALD ADKINS                                      IN   THE    TWELFTH    CIRCUIT
    -V-                                                            COURT      OF   APPEALS
    CHARLES      R.   MITCHELL
    DISTRICT      JUDGE                                                       FiLED IN COURT OF APPEALS"
    12th Court cfAppflaift District
    SABINE COUNTY, TEXAS
    MAY 2 1 20
    AND
    MR.    J.   KEVIN    DUTTON                                                „     TYLER TEXAS
    m
    CATHY S. LUSK. CLERK
    DISTRICT      ATTORNEY
    SABINE COUNTY,         TEXAS
    RELATOR'S ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    TO    THE   HONORABLE    JUDGES   OF   SAID    COURT:
    COMES NOW, Donald Adkins, Relator in pro-se, to bring forth
    before this Honorable Court this Original Application for Writ of
    Mandamus pursuant to 
    Tex. Gov'e Code Ann. § 22.221
    , Vernon's
    Ann.    C.Cf.P.      art 4.03, 4.04, and           4.08 and   the constitution of
    both the      State of Texas, and the United States, and not                       limited
    there to...         and will   show this Honorable Court the following:
    I.
    RELATOR
    Donald Adkins TDCJ-CID No. 1792685, is currently
    incarcerated in the Ramsey One Unit, 1100 FM 655, Rosharon, Texas
    77583, Brazoria County.
    Relator has exhausted his remedies and has not other
    adequate remedy at law. The action sought to be compelled is
    ministerial, and not discretionary in nature.
    District Attorney J.K. Dutton and the District Court's
    Honorable Judge, Charles R. Mitchell of Sabine county, Texas has
    a sworn duty    to uphold the constitution and laws of the State of
    Texas, and our Federal Government... and, Fast and Speedy trial,
    and has failed to do so or has blatantly disregarded their
    obligation they sworn to uphold upon appointment or hire.
    II.
    RESPONDENT(S)
    Respondent(s), district attorney Dutton as well as the
    Honorable judge Charles R. Mitchell, of the Sabine County
    Judicial District Court of Texas h%s the duty to secure and
    protect the Relator's due process and, fast and speedy trial
    rights under State and Federal       law, and State and Federal
    Constitution.
    Ill
    PROCEDURAL       HISTORY
    1. On or about August 4, 2011, notification of        pending
    charges became known to Relator out of the County of Sabine,
    State of Texas nd the Relator requested his attorney, Steve Smith
    to invoke Speedy Trial Rights on Sabine County of Texas, Court's
    thereof.
    2. No document evidence is in possession of the Relator.
    3. On the dates of October 17, and November 20, 2012,
    Relator sent to Sabine County Court and prosecution Motions for
    Speedy Trial    and Bench Warrant.
    4. The Respondents and Court thereof never responded to the
    motions filed on October 17, and November 20, 2012.
    -2-
    5. On December 16, 2013, Relator filed (mailed) a Motion to
    Dismiss pending charges, complaints,           indictments... et-cetra.
    6. Respondents and/or Court thereof never responded.
    7. On January 17, 2014, a letter to the clerk of the court
    of Sabine County, Texas... explained actions priorly taken by
    Relator and nol response was provided and, Relator requested
    status.
    8. On February 19, 2014, a letter explaining the above
    Number 1-7 herein of this writ's procedural           history... was mailed
    to "Honorable Judge, Mitchell           of Sabine County,   Texas,   an
    requested assistance in the interest of justice and as of this
    date no response.
    9. Within numbers 1-8 of this writ's procedural          history, the
    Relator has directed his rights to speedy trial             an rights secured
    bu    federal   constitutional   law.
    10. Relator, under State and Federal        law, provided notice to
    Respondents and the State of Texas, county of Sabine...               in
    writing through his documents filed (mailed) with the Courts of
    Sabine County, Texas.      See 1-9 of this writ's procedural          history.
    11. The Respondents have placed holders (warrants) against
    the    Relator in his prison placement classification screen -
    preventing proper review of parole and institutional security
    levels for privileges, rights enjoyed by others, and parole
    consi deration.
    12. The holders are unconstitutional        and deny the freedoms
    and     privilege due to the Relator.
    -3-
    VI.
    MEMORANDUM
    The issuance of a writ of mandamus is a extreme remedy. Its
    use is limited to instances where:    1). A official   has failed to
    preform a lawful, essentially ministerial duty; 2). The Relator
    has not other viable remedy at law to compel the official to act.
    The Respondents have failed to prevent violations of the
    Relator's rights to due process and fast and speedy trial and in
    so doing dismissing all warrants, holds, indictments, complaints
    et-cetra against him known or unknown to the Relator and by
    failure of Respondents to perform their    duties have prejudiced
    the Relator and violated his secured rights.
    The writ of mandamus is the only viable remedy at law to
    compel the officials to act.
    The Respondents has   failed to perform their duties to
    secure the Relator's secured rights, and further dismiss all
    complaints, warrants, holds et-cetra against the Relator when he
    further attempted to remedy the matter before this Honorable
    Court of his violated rights by multiple attempts to obtain a
    fast and speedy trial and dismissal of the addressed complaints,
    warrants, holds, et-cetra after gross neglect of the Respondents
    during the years of attempted remedies by the Relator! It is
    clear that the Respondents have either failed or refused to even
    attempt to comply with State and Federal   law and/or secured
    constitutional amendments. Consequently, the lasp of time has
    prejudiced any defense the Relator would have had in rememberance
    of detail, knowledge of witnesses and vital culpable and
    -4-
    exculpable facts necessary to show actual                    innocence or key
    factors.     It must be evident that this Relator has attempted any
    and all appropriate exhaustive attempts of a remedy                    and all     such
    attempts has thus far failed to remedy the issues at hand and
    error lies on part of the trial court of Sabine County, Texas                        in
    this case and that the primary issue for this appellate court
    must   be   in   the   interest   to   enforce   the    constitution   of   both   State
    and Federal       Government and restore the rights that are being over
    looked in ignorance of multiple attempts made by this Relator.
    The actions of the Respondents are not in the best interest
    of justice.
    Jurisdiction is proper, not just by statue under Texas State
    law, or that of rule of court,             but...      for   interest to secure      our
    constitutional         intent set forth by our forfathers to overturn the
    crown and a single sided monarchy.
    This Court has "un-wavering" jurisdiction, by rule of Court
    and rights of Relator.
    V.
    PRAYER FOR     RELIEF
    Wherefore Premises considered,             Relator,     Donald Adkins...      in
    pro-se, respectfully request that this Honorable Court finds that
    the Respondents has either failed or refused to perform its
    ministerial duty and has not upheld the letter of the law and/or
    the constitutional         intent and therefore, set forth the following:
    The Relator prays for an order by this Honorable Court
    directing the Respondents to comply with the mandates set forth
    by the constitution in the Promise of Due Process and a fast and
    speedy trial and dismiss with prejudice all counts held against
    the Relator being called a complaint, warrant, indictment
    et-cetra addressed by the Relator in his many attempts made in
    his procedural history section III of this application of a writ
    for mandamus were he proves Respondents has created grounds for
    this   writ   to   issue.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    Donald Adkins Pro-Se
    TDCJ-CID No.1792685
    Ramsey One      Unit
    1100   F.M.   655
    Rosharon,     Tx.   77583
    CERTIFICATE   OF   SERVICE
    I do    hereby certify that a complete copy of the forgoing
    Application for Writ of Mandamus was sent via US mail to:
    1.   Charles   R.    Mitchell                2.   J.Kevin    Dutton
    273rd District Court                     District Att.
    Sabine County, Texas                         Sabine County, Texas
    Mailed this to day of May 2015, by way of Ramsey One
    TDCJ-CID    mail     room.
    Respectfully        Submitted,
    nTonald Adkins Pro-Se
    TDCJ-CID      No.1792685
    Ramsey One Unit
    1100   F.M.   655
    Rosharon, Tx.       77583
    AFFIDAVIT OF   FACT
    I Donald Adkins, do hereby state:
    1. I am Donald Adkins, Relator in the accompanied
    application for writ of mandamus and this         affidavit residing at
    1100 F.M.   655,   Rosharon, Texas 77583 with TDCJ-CID No.1792685.
    2. I do hereby state that all claims made before this
    Honorable Court in the referenced application of writ of mandamus
    are of fact to the best of my knowledge.
    I do hereby under oath make there claims as fact before this
    Honorable Court and do so under the laws of perjury.
    Sworn and signed this iQ       day of May 2015.
    Donald Adkins
    TDCJ-CID No.1792685
    Ramsey One Unit
    1100   F.M.   655
    Rosharon, Tx.       77583
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00135-CR

Filed Date: 5/21/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016