John R. Soard v. Terry Thorn, Shelia Smith and Mary Page ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       ACCEPTED
    12-14-00211-CV
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    6/4/2015 10:27:54 AM
    CATHY LUSK
    CLERK
    No. 12-14-00211-CV
    JOHN R. SOARD,             § IN THE COURT OF FILED
    APPEALSIN
    §             12th COURT   OF
    TYLER, TEXAS
    APPEALS
    Appellant,             §             6/4/2015 10:27:54 AM
    §                  CATHY S. LUSK
    v.                         §   TWELFTH DISTRICT   ClerkOF
    §          TEXAS
    TERRY THORN, SHEILA SMITH, §
    AND MARY PAGE              §
    §
    Appellees.             § SITTING IN TYLER, TEXAS
    APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPELLANT’S APPEAL
    TO THE HONORABLE TYLER COURT OF APPEALS:
    Appellee Terry Thorn (“Appellee”) files this Motion to Dismiss
    Appellant’s Appeal as follows:
    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
    After numerous extensions and without adequate explanation,
    Appellant John R. Soard (“Soard” or “Appellant”) has failed to file his brief,
    which was due April 6, 2015. Soard has also failed to comply with the Clerk’s
    April 9, 2015 notice requiring him to file a motion for extension of time
    containing a reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file his
    Appellant’s Brief no later than April 20, 2015. Accordingly, Appellee requests
    dismissal of his appeal in its entirety for want of prosecution under Tex. R.
    App. P. 42.3(b) and for Appellant’s failure to comply with the Clerk’s notice
    under Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
    1
    BACKGROUND
    Soard filed his notice of appeal on April 4, 2014. Since that time, he
    has filed numerous letters complaining of issues related to the
    completeness of the Clerk’s Record and Reporter’s Record and received
    numerous extensions of time to file his brief.
    On March 6, 2015, the Court sent notice to the parties that the case
    was to be submitted on the Clerk’s Record alone. It ordered Soard to file his
    Appellant’s Brief on or before April 6, 2015. After Soard failed to file his
    brief, the Clerk sent its third Notice of Late Brief on April 9, 2015. The Clerk
    notified Soard that his “appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution
    under Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) unless a motion for extension of time,
    containing a reasonable explanation for such failure and showing that
    Appellee has not suffered material injury thereby, is filed no later than April
    20, 2015.” Soard has since filed several more letters, raising the same
    general complaints he has previously raised regarding the completeness of
    the record, but he has not moved for an extension of time or explained his
    failure to file his brief. Thus, he has not complied with the Clerk’s notice.
    2
    ARGUMENT
    Under Rule 42.3(b), a court of appeals, on the appellee’s motion or on
    its own, may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant
    fails to timely file its brief. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). A court of appeals may
    also dismiss an appeal when an appellant does not comply with a notice
    from the clerk requiring a response within a specified time. Tex. R. App. P.
    42.3(c).
    Soard has repeatedly failed to file his Appellant’s Brief, and despite
    this Court’s granting several extensions of time, ordering that the case be
    submitted on the Clerk’s Record alone, and imposing an April 6, 2015
    deadline for Soard to file his Appellant’s Brief, he still has not done so. Nor
    has he filed a response to the Clerk’s April 9, 2015 notice. Soard has been
    cautioned by the Court and has failed to comply. Because pro se litigants
    must be held to the same standards as any other litigant and must comply
    with applicable and mandatory rules of pleading and procedure, Soard’s
    failure to comply with the briefing deadline and Clerk’s notice warrants
    dismissal of this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) & (c); see also Morris v.
    Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 
    360 S.W.3d 32
    , 36 (Tex. App.—Houston
    [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (“To apply a different set of rules to pro se litigants
    3
    would be to give them an unfair advantage over litigants represented by
    counsel.”).
    PRAYER
    Appellee Terry Thorn respectfully requests that the Court:
    1.)     Dismiss Appellant’s appeal in its entirety; and
    2.)     Award such other relief to which Appellee is entitled.
    Respectfully submitted,
    By: /s/ Michael A. Yanof
    Michael A. Yanof
    State Bar No. 24003215
    Cassie J. Dallas
    State Bar No. 24074105
    Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons,
    L.L.P.
    700 North Pearl St., 25th Floor
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    Telephone: (214) 871-8200
    Facsimile: (214) 871-8209
    Email: myanof@thompsoncoe.com
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE TERRY
    THORN
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
    I certify that this Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Appeal complies with
    Tex. R. App. P. 9.4. As to its length, it contains 575 words (not including the
    matters excluded by Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(1)). Notwithstanding, Rule 9.4(i)
    does not govern motions.
    /s/ Michael A. Yanof___________
    Michael A. Yanof
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that on June 4, 2015, a true and correct copy of the
    foregoing document was served via certified mail, return receipt requested,
    to:
    John R. Soard                           Sheila Smith
    38 Delsie St.                           The Law Office of Sheila Smith
    Clarksville, AR 72830                   P.O. Box 10
    Frankston, TX 75763
    Mary Page
    2201 North Jackson Street
    Palestine, TX 75801
    /s/ Michael A. Yanof___________
    Michael A. Yanof
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-14-00211-CV

Filed Date: 6/4/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016