in the Interest of C.C. and I.C., Children ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    ________________________
    No. 07-15-00185-CV
    ________________________
    IN THE INTEREST OF C.C. AND I.C., CHILDREN
    On Appeal from the 320th District Court
    Potter County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 85,000-D; Honorable Don Emerson, Presiding
    May 13, 2015
    ABATEMENT AND REMAND
    Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
    Appellant, E.V., filed a pro se notice of appeal on April 24, 2015, challenging the
    trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her two children. The termination
    order was signed on March 31, 2015, and, as an accelerated appeal, the notice of
    appeal was due on or before April 20, 2015.1 Appellant was directed to provide a
    reasonable explanation for the untimely filed notice. See Jones v. City of Houston, 976
    1
    In an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the
    judgment or order is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b)
    S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). See also Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex.
    1997); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
    Appellant, still acting pro se, timely filed a response explaining that her court-
    appointed trial counsel advised her that she had thirty days to appeal, and she later
    learned the deadline was twenty days from the date the trial court signed the
    termination order. Appellant’s explanation was accepted by this Court and jurisdiction
    over the appeal exists. The clerk’s record has been filed but the reporter’s record is
    now past due and no extension has been requested.
    Termination of parental rights is an issue of constitutional dimension.        See
    Santosky v. Kramer, 
    455 U.S. 745
    , 758-59 (1982).        See also Holick v. Smith, 
    685 S.W.2d 18
    , 20 (Tex. 1985). Paragraph 13.1 of the trial court’s Order of Termination
    provides as follows:
    IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that GEORGE HARWOOD earlier
    appointed to represent [E.V.] shall continue in that capacity until all
    appeals of a final order terminating parental rights are exhausted or
    waived unless otherwise Ordered by the Court.
    A parent whose parental rights have been terminated must have a right of appeal
    that is meaningful. In re S.K.A., 
    236 S.W.3d 875
    , 890 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007,
    pet. denied). This Court has held that trial counsel’s duty to represent the interests of
    an indigent parent in a termination proceeding does not end with trial but, instead,
    continues until the judgment becomes final or until counsel is expressly discharged by
    the trial court. In the Interest of J.O.A., 
    262 S.W.3d 7
    , 18 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008),
    modified, 
    283 S.W.3d 336
    (Tex. 2009).
    2
    Copies of correspondence from this Court with Appellant in resolving the
    untimely filed notice of appeal were provided to Mr. Harwood.                Those copies
    notwithstanding, he has not taken any action to designate himself as lead counsel in
    this appeal or enter an appearance to represent Appellant in an appeal of constitutional
    import. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(c), 6.2. The reporter’s record is now past due and no
    extension has been requested, possibly indicating that a record has not been
    designated or requested.         Because Appellant is unrepresented by court-appointed
    counsel at this critical stage of her appeal, and given the accelerated nature of
    termination proceedings, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial
    court for further proceedings.
    Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to
    immediately determine the following:
    1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal;
    2. whether Appellant remains indigent and is entitled to appointed counsel to
    pursue this appeal;
    3. whether Mr. Harwood has abandoned the appeal and Appellant is entitled to
    new appointed counsel; and
    4. why the reporter’s record has not been filed.
    Should it be determined that Appellant does want to continue the appeal and the trial
    court determines she is entitled to new appointed counsel, the name, address,
    telephone number, email address and state bar number of newly appointed counsel
    shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court. The trial court shall execute findings of fact
    and conclusions of law, and shall cause its findings, conclusions, and any necessary
    3
    orders to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this
    Court by May 26, 2015. Should Mr. Harwood be permitted to remain as Appellant’s
    appointed counsel he is hereby ordered to immediately enter an appearance in this
    Court and take whatever action is necessary to ensure the filing of the reporter’s record.
    It is so ordered.
    Per Curiam
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-15-00185-CV

Filed Date: 5/13/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016