Digman, Robert Emmanuel ( 2015 )

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS PP-0226-15 JUN 2 6 2015 COA-07-14-00428-CR TR.CT-24,202-C Abel Acosta, Clerk Robert Emmanuel Digman From the 251st District court of Appellant Randall County, Texas and Seventh The State of Texas, Appellee District Court of Appeals, Amarillo Texas Pro Se Motion requesting a rehearing and a EN BANC RECONSIDERATION IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AUSTIN TEXAS To the honorable Justices fo the above said court: Coe now, the appellant int eh above styled and numbered cause and respectfully moves this honorable court to grant appellant a rehearing and a EN BANC reconsideration and in support there of would show the court the fol lowi rTg: " ``~ ``~ ``~ " The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request, are as follows: Appellant Request Robert Digman Oral argument 1854737 NealUnit 9055 Spur 591 Amarillo Texas 79107 FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS June JUN 26, 26 2015 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk It was proven my trial ended with constitutional error that caused harm to my constitutional rights and also my 6th and 14th amendment. My trial was only 4:42, Four hours and forty two minutes long, the DA reserved 3 days. She violated my right of due process before my trial ever began and did it again in her closing statement. It was proven my trial was unfair, all Iwant is a fair trial. Idon't understand how you as a highest court Justices can say a 4 hour and 42 minute trial only half was unfair with constitutional error and the other half was a fair trial. Iquestioned the trial courts' jurisdiction and received no answers on that, was my PDR ever read? If Randall county has so much evidence against me they will not have any problem giving me a fair trial WITH OUT ERROR, HALF of4:42 is only 2:21 two hours and twenty one minutes. They reserved 3 days, the DA even has to apologize to the Judge for the mistakes, how many mistakes are they allowed to make? Ionly was allowed one. The DA is is on her 4th. NO ONE ever asked if I did what Iwas accused of! My trial was done as whole, NOT two parts. Please tell me how only 72 half was infected? Was the first two hours fair or was the last 2 hours fair and only the 42 minutes not fair? Or was it the other way, the 2 hours not fair and the last 2:42 fair? If the DA used all 3 days, first day pick jury, ~2wd dayTpro'secute cbluTTtT^ifd ^ 34 was fair and Vi was not fair. See TRAP 68.1 Generally On petition by any party the court of criminal appeals may review a court of appeals decision in a criminal case. See TRAP rule 74 Please accept TRAP 9,3(B) to suspend copy rule PRAYER FOR RELIEF For the reasons stated above, it is respectfully submitted that the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas should grant this motion for reconsideration. All I want is a fair trial in whole. Respectfully submitted Robert Digman #1854737 Neal Unit 9055 Spur 591 Amarillo Texas 79107 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion has been mailed; U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the office ofthe Criminal District Attorney for Randall County, 2309 Russell Long Blvd Suite 120, Canyon Texas 79015, and to the State Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 12405, Austin, Texas 78711, on this the ^ *T day of May, 2015 Petitioner Pro Se TDCJ # 1854737 %C~:(5~ coo* oU'MU IA/*"* °f**«s L^jg ( ,..,ll,|,l..i„.|.„p.-u.PM.Ml'i'l11ni"ii,ili")ll1,i,1i "?&? I^ :l S2SOB