Jose A. Perez v. Texas Medical Board and Mari Robinson, JD, in Her Official Capacity ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                               ACCEPTED
    03-14-00644-CV
    4220978
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    2/19/2015 5:28:29 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    No. 03-14-00644-CV
    FILED IN
    3rd COURT OF APPEALS
    __________________________________________________________________
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    2/19/2015 5:28:29 PM
    IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS JEFFREY D. KYLE
    AUSTIN, TEXAS                   Clerk
    JOSE A. PEREZ
    Appellant
    Vs.
    TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD and MARI ROBINSON JD, in her Official Capacity
    Appellees.
    AMENDED
    MOTION TO ABATE AND TO AMEND APPELLATE BRIEF
    Jose A. Perez, respectfully moves the Court to Abate and respectfully seeks
    leave of Court to Amend the Appeal. As grounds therefore he shows:
    1- By letter dated February 17th, 2015 the Third District Court of Appeals Clerk
    informed Mr. Perez that the clerk filed a Supplemental Record. Mr. Perez
    has contemporaneously requested that a copy of the same be provided to him
    2- Assuming , arguendo, that the Supplemental Record does not contain new
    information , Mr. Perez respectfully submits that he ought to be allowed to
    amend in order to, inter alia , be afforded the opportunity to cure substantive
    briefing defects before disposing of the appeal based on such defects rather
    than the merits, please see item 3 , infra.
    3- The Third District Court1 has previously stated that:
    “The rules further instruct us to construe the briefing requirements "liberally"
    and that "substantial compliance" is sufficient, as the point of having briefs in
    the first place is merely to "acquaint the court with the issues in a case and to
    present argument that will enable the court to decide the case" and not to
    impose formal requirements as ends in themselves. 
    Id. R. 38.9.
    The rules
    further contemplate that appellate courts will afford parties the opportunity
    to cure any formal or substantive briefing defects before disposing of the
    appeal based on such a defect rather than the merits. See id.; see also
    Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas Am. Bank/Houston, 
    729 S.W.2d 300
    , 300 (Tex. 1987)
    (regarding parallel provisions of former appellate rules). Finally, "[a] brief
    may be amended or supplemented whenever justice requires, on whatever
    reasonable terms the court may prescribe." See Tex. R. App. P. 38.7.” (emph
    added)
    Wherefore he respectfully moves the court to abate the appeal and to
    grant leave to amend his initial appellate brief. .
    Respectfully Submitted,
    _______Jose A. Perez__/S/_______________
    34 Candle Pine Place
    The Woodlands, TX 77381
    theaesculapius@gmail.com
    281-673-0452
    1Majeed v. Hussain, No. 03-08-00679-CV (Tex.App. Dist.3 10/22/2010) citing See Tex. R. App.
    P. 38.7
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    A telephonic conference with Mr. Ross was held on February 19th, 2017 @
    2:00 PM regarding the merits of the instant motions and he stated that he
    objected.
    __________Jose A Perez__/s/____
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    It is hereby certified that a copy of the foregoing “ Appellant’s Amended
    Motion To Abate Appeal and To Amend His Initial Brief ” was served by
    emailing a copy thereof via the State efiling system on this 19th Day of
    February 2015 to:
    Ted A Ross, Esq
    Assistant Attorney General
    PO Box 12548
    Austin, TX 78711-2548
    ted.ross@texasattorneygeneral.gov
    Margaret.Evins@texasattorneygeneral.gov
    __________Jose A Perez__/s/____
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-14-00644-CV

Filed Date: 2/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016