Pegues, Jason Tyrone ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • »qq,’)wz~O_§,o¢/,<:z;
    MR. JASON T. PEGUES #728196
    HUNTSVILLE UNIT
    815 12th STREET
    HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77348
    JULY 15,2015
    TO: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    CLERK OF THE COURT: ABEL ACOSTA
    P.O. BOX 12308
    CAPITOL‘STATION
    AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
    Re: EX parte JASON TYRQNE PEGUES V. THE STATE OF TEXAS
    IN REFERENCE TO CAUSE NO.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 9é-DCR-OZ6185 HCA
    [wR-7A’762_03¢.lowR-74,762_0h.¢¢le-74,762-05]¢
    DEAR CLERK OF THE COURT:
    ENCLOSED IS A COPY OF A MOTION THAT WAS_FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT IN
    REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED CAUSE NUMBERS AND wRITS. IF YOU WILL
    PLEASE FILE THIS IN THE COURT 80 THAT IT MAY BE TAKEN INTO: _``4`` "
    CONSIDERATION UPON HEARING AND RULING, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT.
    THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ASSISTANCE.
    _sPEcTFUL sUBMITTED,
    _,,,,
    /. =¢ZQ§§? __
    AsoN7TYR0NB/PEGUES #72§§;6
    APPLICANT=
    _ HE@EWED sw
    ©QURT oF CRWMNAL APPEALS
    JUL 17 2015
    AB@!ACOS€B,CE@H<
    1 of 1
    No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC&
    WR-74,762-03....WR-74,762-0h....WR-74,762-05
    NOTICE TO THIS HONORABLE COURT
    EX PARTE
    Jason T. Pegues
    mw$m@m@¢°!mm
    THE FOLLOWING IS TO INFQRM THIS HONORABLE COURT THAT A MOTION HAS
    BEEN FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT, AND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SENT A COPY
    TO THIS HONORABLE COURT. IN SUPPORT OF SUCH MOTION SEE:
    Ex parte PoND,als s.W.3d 94 n.13 (TEx.cRIM.APP.zola)=
    Best practices include filing all materials with the
    Trial Court before the Trial Judge has signed his
    Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation
    to this court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from
    amending or supplementing his materials even after
    application is forwarded to this court, as long as those
    materials are filed in the Trial Court.
    E§"¥728196
    CC/FILE: APPLICANT:
    Nq.ga-th-0251as 503 and 94-nca¢ozsias=ncq
    §
    § IN THE znorh DISTRICT counr, §§
    Ex Parte §
    Jaaon TYRQNE PEGUES § \
    - _ oF
    §
    § .
    § FonT BEND couNTY§ TEXAS
    Applicant's Notion Requesting The Court To
    Hold H03 and HCA For 30 Days so Applicant Can
    SuQQlement and Amend The Applications
    Comes now, Jason Tyrone ?egues #728196, Applic cant~ Pro-se, in the
    above styled:énd numbered cause of action respectfully file this
    Motion Requesting The Court To Hold 9h-DCR~026185 HC3 and HCé so the
    inpplicant CannSupplement Amend the Applications due to the
    reconsideration of 96-DCR-026185 HCB and 9&~DCR-026185'HC4 by this
    court based on the perjury made by attorney Cary M.Faden in his first-
    _affidavit that was attached to and rsference in the $tate‘s earlier
    response to both third and fourth writs of habeas csrpus. The
    applicant would also like to show this Honorable Cnnrt the following:
    PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    Applicant filed his initial application 11.07 (HCB) around
    §§§£g§£z* 10LZOlé and on Au§ust_ 27, _2014, the 6ourt of eriminal Appeals
    _-__.
    denied the writ without written order. On December 10, 2014, applicant
    ‘-.»---_..°._¢__-``-,-.¢_._“
    ``fii@d a gusssq ment app11carion 11.07 cnaa)[wa-?a;vez-oa] and oh
    without written order, in which this court reconsidered (HCA) and on
    June_l§;;§l§, the Court of Criminal Appeals Dismissed HC& {WR-7h,762-
    r
    -1-
    d
    vdgg!without written order. Applicant then filed aipost-convicliop
    Motion For Forensic DNA Testing, and upon the State Investigating the
    DNA Testing Motion, on g§gg“§g¢ggl§, the State filed a Supplémental§*
    ;Amended Answer and Supplemental Amended Findings of Fact & Conclpsiona
    ’of Law, Reconsidering the applicant's applications 9AeDCR-026185NHCS
    and 94-DCR-026185 HC& due to the perjury and error made by attorneyL
    Cary M.Fsden in his first affidavit which was attached and referenced
    .in the State's responses to applicant's third and fourth writs, and
    for the Respondent contacting Judge David Newell regarding his
    thoughts on the applicant‘s third application.
    PUR?OSE OF HOTIGN
    1
    Due to the reconsideration of the applicant's third and fourthF
    writ for haheas corpus based on the State's perjury and error, the
    applicant is requesting that this Honorable Court hold the applicant's
    applications HCE and HCQ for 30 days from the date of filing this
    Motion so that applicant can Supplementaand §mend the applications
    which aere reconsidered. SQe Ex ?arte ?GND,&lB S;H.$d 9a n.lB (Tex.
    §§§B;§RR;ZQL§)‘
    Best practices include filing all materials with the
    Trial\Court before the Trial Judge has signed his
    'Findings of Fact and made his Recommsndation
    to this Court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from
    amending or supplementing his materials even after
    Application is forwarded to this Court,as long as those
    materials are filed in the Trial Court.
    The applicant also request that the applicant be appointed to
    counsel based on the facts, the record, surfacing the many unresolved
    issues in the current proceedings of this case g§l§§. with the
    applicant being ?ro-se and layman of the law, there are some filings
    that can be filed unknown to the applicant w§ich could assist bin in
    these proceedings or harm him . Upon being appointed counsel;‘the
    applicant request that the appointed counsel do not file anythiné
    until the applicant and the appointed counsel have discussed all::
    area’s of the proceedings, asking this Honoraole Court to order the
    appointed counsel to show proof that the applicant and appointed
    cpunsel have done as such.
    tastly, the applicant request anLive Evidentiary Hearing based on
    .; x-
    the credibility cf all those who have responded to the haheas_corpue
    (r.
    ¢"f
    :.
    FD
    b
    iii
    ¥'
    "§
    )
    ;proceedings as well at Mesting Motioe Investigation that is
    currently active in this case.aattorney Cary M.Faden was very aware of
    what the DNA test results were because ne was the one who cross~
    examined the crime lab criminalist Monica Thompson. The bottom line
    is that if the applicant would not have filed a Motion For Forensic
    DNA Testing, attorney Cary M.Faden's perjury would not have possibly
    ever came to light. So the question is what other lies have been told
    and how long have these false and slendering statements been atated.
    Out cf all these proceedings, the applicant only request for a New
    Punishment'&earing. Howvser, factually, legally, ana procedurally there
    are some unresolved issues that needs to be addressed and fairly
    adjudicateu.
    azalea
    WHEREFORE PREHISES CONS!DERED, applicant, laeon Tyrone Peguas``#728196,
    respectfully prays that this Honorable Court grant this Motion
    requesting the court to hold HC3 and HC& for 30 Days so applicant can
    Supplement and Amend the appl&canions, as well as appoint the
    applicant to counsel for the habeas proceedings and DNA Testlng
    .~'.r;
    proceeding. Baeqd on the perjury and error by the State, questions the
    erdibility of those representing the State who have spoken and responded in
    proceedings pertaining to this case §§l§§.TThe applicant prays thai this
    Honorable Ceurt agrees that a Live Evidentiary Hearing is reasonable and
    en;itled to the applicant. Over-ell the applicant prays that this Honorable
    Court’heve mercy and grant fhis Motion that has been presented respectfuliy
    to this Honorable Court.
    EXECUTED UN THIS lStB day of §§LX,ZOLS.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    .SGN .. m ~
    HUNTSVILLE UNIT
    815th 12th STREET
    HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 773&8
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,Jason Tgrone Pegues #72819§, The applicant, being presently confined
    in Walker'Couhty, Texas do hereby affirm that 1 have delivered the original
    of this Notion Requesting The Court To Hold HCS and 364 For 3? D¢ys ss
    o
    Apricent Can Supplement and Amend The Applications to the pri$ h mailroom
    ‘officials for delivery to the following via U.S.Poetal Service;
    THE DISTRICT CLERK, ANNIE REBECCA ELLIDTT
    OF FORT BEND CGUNTY
    ZAOth JUDICIAL DISTBICT COURT
    HONGRABLE JUDGE THOMAS R.CULVER,III
    301 JACKSON STREET
    RICHNOND, TEXAS 77659
    A copy of this Motion has been forwarded toe
    THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    P.O. Box 12308
    Capitol Station
    Austin, Texas 78711
    ’£ile:
    cc/file:
    INMATE DECLARATION
    I,JASGN TYRONE PEGUES #728196, Preeently inearcereted in Walker C;urty,
    Texas hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the above j
    mentiened in my Motion Requesting The Court To Hcld 363 and HC& Hor*
    30 Bag§ so Applicant Cen SuppleHentaénd Amend TBe Applications la true
    and correct.
    Signed on this §§ER day of ig&§,ZOl$.
    Respectful “_bmitted,
    7: taxi
    Asot T. treats #728196 ga
    Applicant:
    HUNTSVILLE UNIT
    815 12th street
    HUNTSVILLE, maine 773a3
    -5_
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-74,762-05

Filed Date: 7/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016